MFGG - Mario Fan Games Galaxy

Pages: (25) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Aug 28 2016, 6:54 PM	See Page
Quote (Simpson55 on Aug 27 2016, 1:01 PM) Why was Turd Feast 4 removed though? At the author's request, I believe.

Jun 27 2016, 1:04 AM	See Page
The last update was more a parody than a condemnation of Mighty No. 9 (and even then, only of its trailer) - I've done similar format updates previously for things I actually do like. I couldn't care less about the quality of the game since I don't like Mega Man games to begin with. It is a shame it's apparently awful, but I was never going to play it anyway.

Jun 3 2016, 1:42 AM	See Page
Quote (KirbyLover2048 on May 27 2016, 4:44 AM) Excuse me, but I uploaded a sheet of Super Mario Land Shy Guys, and it never got accepted OR rejected. Is someone holding my sheet for reasons, or is it forgotten about? Please answer, it's really bothering me... Don't make me get my "why is my submission taking so long" response out. I still have it somewhere, and I WILL use it.

May 23 2016, 12:08 PM	See Page
I'm a Freecell man myself. ... Which is a form of solitaire, but whatever.

Feb 3 2016, 11:24 PM	See Page
Quote (Willsaber on Jan 29 2016, 8:45 PM) Oh, but it couldn't be this, riiiiight? XD HEY I resemble that remark! I mean, uh... I totally pull my weight around here. I dunno what you're talking about.

Jan 19 2016, 3:02 AM	See Page
Quote (SuperMarioOfficial on Jan 18 2016, 6:09 PM) Why not? Is there an actual reason to it? Bandwidth. I said something to that effect here: Click me! (I hardly blame anyone for not seeing that. It was three years ago.) It's also just because, from a graphic design standpoint, animated thumbnails are distracting, unnecessary visual noise that if left unchecked would just result in visual chaos. Imagine if EVERY thumbnail were animated. Or turned into practical "mini-movies." I know that's what Quality Control's supposed to prevent but it's easier to say "don't do it" and save a lot of people a lot of time.

Jan 19 2016, 1:05 AM	See Page
Just kind of a bummer that animated thumbnails aren't allowed!

Nov 22 2015, 5:30 AM	See Page
Never expected a Don Knotts reference of all things on this website.

Sep 16 2015, 6:44 PM	See Page
Quote (IAmGreenMike on Sep 16 2015, 7:28 AM) "The game is rated 3.1 out of 10, which means that I need to improve this game 69%, but do you HONESTLY believe that 69% of this game is missing?" No. The game is bad. It is bad by virtue of being a bad game, not a really good clone of Flappy Bird. As someone who has never played Flappy Bird I would give this game a 1/10. Reviews aren't about what "other people would think." They're about what the reviewer thinks. If you think it deserves reviews from fans of Flappy Bird only, and tens just because it's a really good clone of Flappy Bird, then you're deluding yourself. You should've posted this on a Flappy Bird community then. Your ridiculous argument that I've quoted can be applied to so many things. For example, technically Twilight Princess is a complete game, it plays well, it's lengthy. I still wouldn't give it a ten. I'd give it maybe a three. That doesn't mean 70% of the game is missing. That just means I didn't think it was fun, and I doubt Nintendo intended to make a boring game. If you think I'm not allowed to share this opinion, then you are attacking the very concept of art and freedom of expression. Your intent in making the game means nothing - the player's experience is everything. That is what gives the game its value.

Sep 16 2015, 4:38 AM	See Page
Quote The reason this argument exists, is because my game is under the judgment of a rating system that judges it as a MFGG game, instead of simply a game. I do not have a problem with low scores. I DO have a problem with ANY scores, low or high, that judge the game only as compared to other games on the site it is hosted on. I'm not sure how this is such a complicated idea to most of you, especially admins (aren't admins selected because of their ability to understand a problem and resolve it accordingly? Because "target audience" seems like the type of concept an individual should be able to understand if he's selected to be an admin..) Judging it as a game inevitably compares it to other games - with no comparisons, how do we make a standard for quality? How do we know what good gameplay is without an example, or good graphics, or good sound-design? You also openly invited this with your silly "hamburger-mozzarella-sticks" comparison. Yes, this is a mozzarella stick, and not a hamburger, but that means we can compare it to other mozzarella sticks, of which there are many. As for the target audience, throughout the years there have been many forms of media with a target audience that attracts a peripheral audience - by posting your game here, you have gleefully invited this peripheral audience by hosting it in their domain. All games on this site have the users as their audience - expecting otherwise is foolhardy. If you wanted to limit your audience, then you should have hosted this on a different site. Nobody here cares if you posted it here to be easier for your friends to find and download - there are other sites you can do that on. But you posted it here, with admission that there is a review system, a comments system, and users. You have nobody to blame for this but yourself.

Sep 16 2015, 4:37 AM	See Page
Quote (IAmGreenMike on Sep 15 2015, 8:11 PM) I don't know how you can expect short comments when there is just SO MUCH stupidity here. I have to type a LOT of information. You don't, but okay. Quote Although I was fully aware that there is a rating system when I clicked "Submit File" I did not anticipate all you special cookies thinking that this game is JUST FOR YOU. Nobody thinks this game was just for them. It's posted to a public forum that they visit, so it's fair to say it's there for them to play, however. If it's not here for us to play, then it should be removed from the site, clearly. Quote This game was submitted TO THE WEBSITE. Not the website's USERS. This gives the impression it was never meant to be played. How can someone play the game if there are no users to play it? Quote To assume that every other game on this website must compare to each other, is to assume that everybody who plays a game that is hosted on this website - whether they are a member or not - must play EVERY game on this website in order to enjoy it. That's not what that means. That means that as another game on the website it is in competition with other games by virtue of being on the site. I could spend my time playing this game, or look for another one on the site. Simple as that. Quote It's adorable that people think that I don't know what I'm talking about, but can any of you tell me what a "target audience" is? Nobody cares what your target audience was. You posted it here. You get our users playing it whether you agree with whether they should have an opinion or not. Quote So, if you have negative things to say about my content but don't consider its intent, then you WILL get an earful! Have you perhaps heard of the Death of the Author? Interesting subject. Quote You have no room to be talking to me like I'M the one who doesn't know how things work. On the other hand, if you have negative things to say about my content and you DID consider my intent, then I will listen and learn because I'm not egotistical. Then start. I haven't seen much evidence of this. Quote No matter what argument you try to return with, "To be compared to other games" is NOT the only reason to make a game, and just because my game is submitted to MFGG, does not mean that it is submitted to MFGG's users. I've no doubt you didn't make this game to be compared to the other games, nobody does. But as a game posted on this site, it will inevitably and rightfully be compared to the other games. Again, if you're not submitting it here for the users to play it, then why are you submitting it here? Free hosting? You're basically complaining about the fact that because you posted your game in a public place with a comments system people are having opinions. Quote So keep on wasting your time arguing with me. Another argument easily flipped around on you - since of course, you are doing much the same by continuing to argue with us!

Sep 16 2015, 4:02 AM	See Page
Quote (IAmGreenMike on Sep 15 2015, 7:48 PM) By that logic, I feel compelled to compare every game on MFGG to every game in the world. I believe that all the games on MFGG, because they were created on Earth, are supposed to compare to Super Mario 64, for one example. Since you wanna live on Earth and make games at the same time, you must compare all of Earth's games to yours. Don't argue with that, cause I'll say "Well how do you expect to make a video game and have it playable on Earth, and then not want people to compare it to every other game?" Oh wait, that's a stupid way of thinking. I'm pretty sure that none of the games on this site are better than Super Mario 64, so they would ALL be really bad by default. When I made this game, it wasn't so that it could be better than every other game on the site. That should be obvious. MFGG is not the site that I picked games from to compare them to mine. MFGG is the site that I chose to host the game for anybody who would like to download it. Not just you bunch of whiney, disrespectful children. But my own friends who would like to download the game. Well, too bad, you posted your game in a public forum and you're going to have to deal with the public forum's thoughts on your public forum-posted game. It's not a crime to share one's thoughts on your game. That is, after all, why there are comments. It's perfectly fair to compare this game to other games on MFGG. It is an offering on MFGG for others to play, perhaps there are better offerings on MFGG to play. It is perfectly fair to compare this game to other games in an attempt to determine if one would want to play it. After all, if I had to pick between spending my time playing this or playing, say, Metal Gear Solid V because they just so happened to be the two games I had at the time, but I obviously can only play one at a time, surely I would have to compare and contrast the merits or lack thereof of playing both. Your ridiculous attempt at hyperbole fools nobody, and deserves an answer with more hyperbole. I'm keeping an eye on this comments section. Any more insults get thrown around and there'll be trouble. This is getting out-of-hand.

Sep 15 2015, 7:26 AM	See Page
Quote (IAmGreenMike on Sep 14 2015, 8:59 PM) As the designer, the game IS what I INTEND it to be. People should start considering the intent of the person who says or does something before forming opinions. If your intent is to make unambitious games that bring nothing new or interesting to the table, then that's your prerogative. Others will disagree with this notion of yours, and there's nothing wrong with that. After all, your silly restaurant logic makes no sense and can be turned on its head rather easily - sure this is a mozzarella stick and not a burger... but there's other mozzarella sticks out there. All I'm gonna say on the matter.

Sep 3 2015, 12:43 AM	See Page
Quote (rchammer97 on Aug 26 2015, 3:27 PM) Tell me you didn't seriously steal a joke from Doug Walker. Really? The three-strikes thing? Because Doug Walker invented baseball jokes.

Apr 13 2015, 7:41 PM	See Page
Quote (Jaden1291 on Apr 12 2015, 8:31 PM) With what Somari64 said, LooneyTunerIan and the other members, make it stop right here. If an argument/flamewar sparks after this, expect a mute from the site staff. Now I want you to please get back on topic. Didn't know you were a mod. Please leave warnings to the site staff.

Sep 23 2014, 9:41 AM	See Page
Quote (AsteriskX on Sep 22 2014, 5:45 PM) AOL? What does that stand for? I never thought I'd see the day where someone genuinely had no idea what AOL was. My, how times have changed. (It stands for America Online.)

Mar 15 2014, 8:49 PM	See Page
It's not an Easter egg. I've poked fun at it more than once myself. It's just a tricky fix I think.

Mar 9 2014, 10:02 PM	See Page
Quote (Jaden1291 on Mar 8 2014, 4:49 AM) Hey guys, back from my absence due to PC privilege loss. Also, DKC:TF is 3D, i think. So is Super Smash Bros. but that hasn't stopped people from making sprites based on it.

Feb 15 2014, 10:25 PM	See Page
In artwork for the original Super Mario Bros., Mario and Luigi's overalls and shirts did in fact have their colours swapped from the way they are now. In fact that's how it is in Super Mario All-Stars' remake of Super Mario Bros. as well. So that's an odd thing to complain about.

Feb 7 2014, 2:56 AM	See Page
WHOOPS. Looks like I made a boo-boo when I posted the site update. It's okay now. Not very big, but okay.

Pages: (25) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25